Gee, I finally made a mistake.
I meant concept comprehension.
So now I only have to make about 3-400 more to catch up to you on mistakes in theory and comprehension/application.
Collective Bias,
>>It seems to me that the further into this topic we wade the more people get disillusioned and quit. ie: Nick. <<
In this instance it is Nick. Prior to that the same indeterminable number of times it has been other respected contributors. Who will it be next time? That is why it needs to be stopped now, no more Robbie Rants on this forum.
We have plenty of topics in which this doesn't occur, it ALWYS happens in a LZ thread, so let's eliminate the common denominator: no more robbie rants from lz.
ShyTorque,
Yes, it is like you say. Of course your experience only serves to give reason why he is not a guru or mentor, and the reason he shouldn't be allowed to drivel and insult those in the know anymore with it.
I say that those who have been driven off rotorheads would be more likely to participate once word that LZ has been removed reaches them, for they would not have to experience what ST and many others have.
You can call it an attack if you want, but I'm not the one insulting every professional heli pilot, test pilot, or real engineer here, that seems to be LZ's only forte'.
We repeat this cycle every time, if you can't prevent the cycle, you remove the initiator.
The question to ask yourselves fellow PPRuNer's, is if you wish to allow LZ to stay, then he can stay, but there is NO reason we have to continually revisit this warped flawed theory of his again, ever:
He has not brought forth anything new to the conversation, and remains entrenched in flawed thinking when the very people he came here to ask originally have told him he is wrong.
Want to participate in other topics like he purports to want to do? Great.
Ban the robbie rantings. It's been covered. For it serves no purpose at all but to the things ST and CB brought forth.
[ 03 August 2001: Message edited by: RW-1 ]