PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Is Raw Data Outmoded?
View Single Post
Old 31st July 2005 | 22:49
  #17 (permalink)  
Alpine Flyer
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 480
Likes: 27
From: at the edge of the alps
Thumbs up

IMHO raw data practice is required as long as raw data flying might be required in an emergency situation.

On most aircraft I have flown so far the flight directors are gone in a battery-power-only situation, so it seems prudent to mee to practice flying without them.

In an ideal world this practice would be done in a simulator, but as many companies won't schedule more sim time than the regulations require, and that time is completely filled with other "required training", this probably won't happen.

I don't think raw data flying compromises safety when limited to VMC and "other than high density" traffic situations.

I wouldn't practice it at LHR or FRA.

I am not a grizzled veteran (flying the line for 15 years) and rather feel that copilots should switch off FDs (even APs/ATS) more often. I very often see FOs switching the AP off at 700 AGL. I probably couldn't hand-fly any ILS if I always let the AP do it's job....)

I also agree that "real" raw data is hard to train, as most glass cockpits offer a lot of helpful stuff even when the FD is off. (speed trend, flight path vector, etc.)
Alpine Flyer is offline