What complete and utter nonsense!
We spend more time saying no than yes. Ther ahve already been a bucket load of no's before it gets anywhere near a vote.
You clearly have no idea what you are talking about. If you think we are a management mouthpiece then just think what you would have to suffer if we were not here.
Yes, we pushed the deal because the alternative on offer was bordering on disaster.
The existing status quo was not an option. It was not on the table for discussion or negotiation. It was 5/2/5/4 or random (flexible) rostering, min contractual leave, and 20 days less off per year than now.
So at least now we know what you would have voted for!
I'll make no more comments on this thread.