To: RW 1
I take that as a no. You don't want me to offer you my theories about what might have caused the latest accident. If you hadn’t pulled your thread you would be able to see that I did respond to your statements about the AD. It should have been obvious even for you that I could not tell you if the latest crash in the GOM related to the AD because they have not recovered the tail boom. I told you that the information letter offered the possibility that the AD did not go far enough and that the subject GOM crash could point out an entirely different problem that would be much greater than a tailboom strike.
[This message has been edited by Lu Zuckerman (edited 31 January 2001).]
[This message has been edited by Lu Zuckerman (edited 31 January 2001).]