Another 'scoop' that turns out to be a 'ho-hum' story. The fact that the Democrat party crops up so frequently in the article should give some idea of it's impartiality. Face it, the war was legal - Saddam wasn't 'forced' to do anything, he chose to break UNSCR 678 and 687, if you don't like it challenge it through the courts - Seems like some posters will clutch at any straw to support their Anti-Labour views
What next? Britain 'forced' Germany to violate Belgium’s neutrality and thus are responsible for the First World War?