Ah, jeez hemac,
I was hoping that this thread was just going to 'die a death' but you've asked me a question so I feel obliged to answer.
or is it that you want this paticular job? Well, are you sure you're not SilageSid in disguise? I refer you back to my posts of the 4th & 5th of May. I'm so far away from wanting this job you won't believe it.
What started as an idle thought on my part about what a cr@ppy job this was developed into a brief discussion on matters such as PPLs flying for renumeration and VFR machines & pilots potentially being pressurised into flying in IFR conditions (with the usual added dose of 'Sid cynism and bitterness'). I reasoned that this was a job for an experienced 206 pilot who had the b@lls when to say 'no'. Unfortunately, an experienced pilot wouldn't look twice at the job so it'd be left to a low experienced guy/gal.
SECTION REMOVED - Rumour network or not, your "speculation" about pilot error is out of order, and grossly unfair to another pilot whose professional reputation might be damaged by irresponsible comments of that sort.
Heliport
Thanks for that, Heliport. Can I please remind you and others that it wasn't myself who first speculated about the link between this job and the accident at Haverfordwest? It was MPR on the 29th of May. Is his post not going to be 'moderated' as well?
And you're right, Sid. I am going to ignore you.
If you do want to 'go pro' and stay onshore, please take Camp Freddie's advice which is repeated here time and time again. You won't get a job (that you'll actually want) with just a CPL(H). Budget for an FI(R) rating as well. Then your opportunities will multiply.
But then again, this is all just 'IMHO' so regards,
B73
Last edited by Bravo73; 1st June 2005 at 09:19.