But you have to agree that if you finished flightschool with 250 hrs and you go without flying for one or two years before deciding to take drastic measures and buy a type-rating
On a sunny Sunday afternoon; I agree
Since the name of this thread is Dan Fly 737 I would like to know why this school has opted for a short course like they have, instead of giving their students, low-time or not, a fair oportunity to develop their 737 skills over, say 12 sessions rather than 8-9.
Shall I gamble on an answer? I have no idea why, but could it be that it is easier to attract students with a course price lower than the competition. I do not know what they charge for a course, but it must be less than a school with a 12 session program
For sake of argument and based on the assumption that most pilots will gain from a longer rather than a short course; Could it be that they are going for quantity versus the competition?