Some of you just dont get it.
Its not a case of general opinion saying shes not guilty because she's an attractive female. The outrage is directed against the proces, which is flawed at best and currupt at worst.
If someone knowingly traffics drugs, admits to it, and is proved to have done it, then throw them to the wolves I say, with no mercy. Our standards of proof are much more strict than the developing world.
You have to be proved that you knew the drugs were there, you put them there, prior knowledge being the key. The Corby case illustrates, that while casually strolling down the beach at Kuta, someone could break into your hotel room, plant some drugs in your room, then call the cops and bingo, ur done for dealing drugs. How would you prove your innocence, afterall the drugs are in your room, therefore you must be guilty. Your're a drug dealer. How on earth do you prove your innocence.
How easy would it be to frame someone you didnt like