I know where you're coming from Ditz, and I agree with you to some extent...
1) Of course I want the Jetconnect crew to keep their jobs. Far be it from me to want otherwise!
2) I know we don't currently perform the planned flying - therefore, we're not physically losing anything.
Of my main concerns, relating to the above, is the dangerous precedent in allowing Jetconnect (or anyone else for that matter!) to do our flying. Another example is Jetstar Asia, who will also present the same problems for us when they eventually start to operate ex Australia also!
We've only to look at the flow on effect offshore labour has created for Short and Long Haul in terms of the impact it's had on their working conditions and pattern planning in Australia. I'm all for increased efficiencies, etc. - just not at the expense of the people who helped get the airline to where it is today!
Now - if discussions relating to the use of offshore labour at Jetstar had occurred (between the FAAA, members, etc)...then I wouldn't mind. Reason being is that some form of consultation (and hopefully, resolution) would be forthcoming by way of a vote, etc. from the members.
My biggest concern is the unfettered, unlimited potential the use of ANY foreign labour in ANY manner poses at Jetstar. The Industrial Relations laws in Australia are changing to the detriment of the Employee - and as such, I have every right to feel nervous!
Again - I'm simply playing the ball, not the player. The crew (whatever their division or subsidiary) have nothing to do with the formation of these decisions. Sadly!