why would the feeds be ‘pulled’ if they have no bearing on the safety/security of air travel?
If you read my post, you would have noticed in the second matter I raised. Should an accident/incident/failure occur, there is little to no use in having access to it, especially those who may only have a very basic understanding of what is transpiring. I'm not trying to advocate a veil of secrecy, just common sense over what may lead to the distortion of what actually happened, especially if external factors begin to bear (and in this litigation culture we live in..........I'll leave that up to your intelligence).
If Mr Beckham fouls up and ‘genuinely’ questions his own abilities ‘off the back’ of accusations made from anyone of 100,000 rabble in the stands; then he shouldn’t be doing the job.***
That's quite an analogy.........and it's utter bull!!!!. Air Traffic Controllers adhere to strict procedures and operations, which takes some time to learn (and not everybody is suited to). I can tell you personally that I would certain listen to another controller's input on something to do with the job. But your analogy. Give me a break. You honestly believe what you have written?
but anyone wishing to tell me ‘what an abuse of their professional rights’ they would feel – then save it, I kinda worked that out.
Is that through your professional capacity to discuss the matter?
WB SATCO - Basically Mr BAW001 is a spotter who wants live feed on the internet. He seems to take the occasional swipe about professionalism then hold his hands up and says "not me Guv". It sounds like he thinks ATC is like football, and that David Beckham would make a good controller. The rest is just crap.