PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - GOM - yet another ditching
View Single Post
Old 9th May 2005, 01:16
  #62 (permalink)  
Hippolite
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: In my house
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So, it seems to sum up the GOM operations:

Twin engine, perceived difficulty of operation, paperwork, c of g calculations, slow turnarounds, passenger weights, performance calculated, single engine accountability, beach +30 fuel etc etc


Single engine, easy to operate, no paperwork, passengers not weighed, no performance calculations, field fuel only, fast turnarounds, cheaper operation.

The perception that twin engine is no good for field ops is driving the use of single engine, poorly equipped aircraft. There are some Gomex aircraft that don't even have a VSI. That means limited panel from the start and not all pilots have an instrument ticket. What chance when one encounters inadvertant IMC?

There are some responsible oil companies and helicopter operators who are trying to do it safely. Its a shame that it is they and not the regulators who seem to have to drive the safety improvements. Safty is a VERY hard sell in the GOM, many companies just want cheap.

HH
Hippolite is offline