Gaunty
Point taken re the interception of emails. That they were intercepted is fact.
How they were intercepted may not have been by electronic stealth,
more likely simple theft, such as printing them out without the owners authority or knowledge.
B1 and B2 are definitely on the case, and they are not likely to appreciate being deceived by the protectors.
B1 has frequently been given cold hard factual evidence, evidence that was at the time discounted.
(and given to the accused to investigate himself!!)
B2 is now in the game, and yes with B1 and B2 working on the problem, a resolution is likely.
The problem with the resolution, as you have noted, is dealing with the problem without being seen to lose face.
More sackings are indicated, both at Head Office, and at regional level.
Then, and only then can the new AM NQAO get on with the job of implementing Byron's desired reforms.
AC is held in good regard by the industry and is an ethical person, something that does not sit well with his subordinates.
Sufficient evidence, if available, should now be assembled to assist the AFP conduct an external investigation of certain questionable
and possibly criminal behaviour, rather than leaving it to CASA to investigate it's own.
CASA has proven incapable of conducting a credible internal investigation,
and cannot be permitted to waste another $50,000 on specifically tailored reports.
Byron was possibly misled in the conduct of the tailored investigation
and needs to have a little chat with those who made him look silly.
and yes, I will view the video, even though the similarities of behaviour may enrage me.
And finally, B1 and B2 need all the help, all the evidence that can be mustered, BUT, this time they MUST ACT!
Last edited by Captain Starlight; 30th Apr 2005 at 10:40.