Thank you for your reply.
I don't think I put my point across very well. I'm not itnerested in national averages or school averages.
prospective employers may interpret a second /third time pass on one particular subject as a negative against an individual.
All I am saying is that if the individual sat one of the really nasty exams, such as Feb/Apr Perf exams, ordinarily had the exams been consistent, they would have been fine. However, as the exam was disproportionately harder than normal, they will have this small blip on what would otherwise be an exemplary pass rate and that may count against them when it comes to getting a job. All because the CAA failed to be consistent.
Is this off the mark?
Woof