I've been watching the development of this thread with some interest. A few issues seem to crop up relating to what the FAA call Technologically Advanced Aircraft (anything with G1000/Entegra/Meggit etc etc kit).
Firstly, the assumption that 'these systems are almost as complicated as an Airbus' is silliness - they are MORE complicated from a data, softkey and menu depth point of view. What they lack is the integration with complex autoflight systems and flight phase related issues.
Secondly, Flying School breadth of knowledge and currency in handling/coping with these systems and communicating best practise is extremely poor.
Regarding my first point, here's the rub. Airbus/Boeing EFIS and fourth generation airliners differ from light aircraft in two broad areas; Airliners generally operate in tightly controlled (class A, if you will) environments typically from controlled IFR capable airports to similarly equipped destinations. Next, they are operated by two crewmembers (with additional crew for longer sectors). Generally, when airliners operate outside of these environmental parameters the risk goes up and crews are trained to be alert to this.
The transition between IFR and VFR environments (for example a circling approach) is typically the worst handled aspect of using advanced instrumentation and avionics. Specifically, appropriate systems use is the root cause of many incidents.
Now here's where the words put some distance between traditional light aviation and 'new technology'. Pilots need to become familiar with managing their flight: Managing systems, workload, distractions and data are critical to effectively running a TAA operation. Retaining an awareness of appropriateness (!) and personal capacity must become second nature.
Guess what? Basic flying ability must simply 'live' underneath all of these other skills and - in the spirit of appropriateness - must leap to the fore when required.
Which brings me on to the second point. Without experienced instructors and coaches who remain current on the specific systems in addition to being talented educators we are lost. This demands legislative support that embraces this new kit and puts in place the framework on which to build skills.
In summary, this new machinery needs investment, technology in education and an open mind. Sadly, these characteristics are lacking at nearly every level in UK Light aviation.
Nothing much to do with airborne A-Class engines but sort of relevant, I feel...