As to no landing fees at MSE surely that in the current EUnion laws would be illegal and would have been challenged by another LC outfit. I was under the impression that Ryan had already got into trouble at Char-----.
That's because over at CRL, they're state-owned (or state-funded). The rule is "no subsidsies" to create a level playing field between airports and airlines - but if a privatly held (and funded) entity wants to burn its money, be it by running an airport at loss or by running an airline at loss, that's basically fine with the EU.
Such behaviour might amount to unfair competition, but that's unlikely in this case, and anyway the EU doesn't care. The competitors do, but in EUjets case, they probably can just sit and wait for the wheels to come off the wagon. Saves a lot of money on legal fees.