>We have to bear in mind those articles every time we fly. But they do not permit you to justify a claim that an activity that is not explicitly approved or published is therefore illegal.<
bookworm - thanks for that - I feel suitable chastised!
I was not saying that it follows that one is in contravention of Articles 63/64 just because one is flying a non published instrument approach. I just think that maybe some pilots need to bear in mind that, generally, such a practice means they may not be enjoying the usual level of safety compared to an approved procedure with full ATC.
Thanks for your interpretation of this Rule wrt "aircraft" - I had not read it that way which shows the advantages of debating such issues - that way we all learn something new.
I will see if I can get Flying Lawyer on the case!
Happy Easter