Well,
Mark, at least you are honest about being biased!
However, I trust that you will point out the COST to the Consumer of any changes. After all, it will pay to remember two things. 1 - Openness is based on trust so if you stitch people up editorially, you as a professional will pay for it in the long run as people will cut you off. 2 - Even a campaign must be realistic. As I said in my last post, problems are solved by teamwork between all Stakeholders. If you are unrealistic you simply make yourself look foolish and further tarnish the Journalist as a Professional.
By all means call for a satisfactory solution but I trust you will include the sentiments of the Trading Standards lassie I cited and basically say "This is what we would like to see and these are the costs and benefits associated with that solution".
Look forward to your article!
H 'n' H <img src="wink.gif" border="0">