G'day TT
Interesting point re the vaule of shareholders investments. I guess I am saying the shareholders must be aware of the IMPLICATIONS of management actions otherwise they wouldn't have endorsed them?
As I have stated on another post I truly believe (for the majority of crew) this is really about rostering (and perhaps B scale P fund) and getting a life. However it has escalated into a whole raft of issues which
have sadly resulted in an impasse.
My concern is that the Nigel and John have
underestimated shareholder resolve this time round and it will end in tears. I sincerely hope not.