From a previous post responding to eal401
eal401
So, because you can't think of a justification, the pilot must be a moron.
Let's see .....
"refused to be security checked" Whose version of events is that? The pilot? The security man? The journalist who wrote the story?
Refused to be checked at all?
Or to the satisfaction of the security man - who may have been sensible and reasonable, or silly and unreasonable.
Maybe the pilot reacted rashly out of sheer frustration at an over-zealous check?
Not a million miles from what happened, it seems.
