Please QED
Quote: 757 powerbacks are an approved procedure
So why can't reverse thrust be employed all the way down to taxing speed on the roll out? Surely the stand...(however remote prb46)..is an area where litter contamination would be at the greatest risk. (aisde from the thread) I would like to know why this is an approved procedure. Surely the runway is not a higher risk then the apron or stand?
I have no idea about this but would appreciate an explanation
Many Thanks