PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Equipment redundency and certification
View Single Post
Old 16th February 2005 | 16:08
  #5 (permalink)  
212man
50 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 1999
: ATPL
Posts: 7,376
Likes: 933
From: Den Haag
I agree that the FDR/CVR should not consume power to the detriment of occupent safety; obviously. I still would have thought in this day and age it should be possible to maintain both.

Although not directly applicable, look at the controversy surrounding the Mull of Kintyre Chinnok as a result of having no FDR/CVR at all. Not fitted or not powered; the outcome is the same (lots of extra work, speculation and possible controversy).
212man is online now