So, as I see it, and most others, I was pretty close to the mark then wasn't I? I would say closer to 9 out of 10 then? As for blustery blow holes, I should think your posts cover that definition nicely, love (bit of a concern Warwick, calling another bloke "love").
Your tactics are clear, bluff and bullsh!t, then name call and try never to answer a question or statement, especially one thats true. Such as (point 10) what did happen to those fired pilots? Hardly due process, love. If that was true, why the current labour court case? Can you answer that one without insults, love?
Also, hate to harp on, love, but what about an apology for that comment? You claim the moral high ground, yet your not man enough to offer an apology? Sad, you must be high up in management. How about charging those Tsunami victims full fare? Nicely done. In another post you claim pilots wages are "chump change", if so, why not chuck a little more at your employees? Might make them happier, god forbid, love.
I await your name calling and dance routine, love
Nosey
Edited to ask why you deleted your post Ozi, you know the one, telling chickenscanfly to leave, calling him an angry young man and giving him links to several personnel agencies? But I don't suppose I'll get an answer to that or this one, how is it that all your posts are during normal business hours?
