How can TUS accept this when we, the members, haven't been consulted or even informed that this is an option?
Don't the members of a pension fund have any say in the running of said fund?
Aren't we as shareholders also entitled to our views to be listened to and can't we call an extraordinary general meeting to discuss this and other burning issues and get Stephen Byers along to see that this could all be going for a ball of chalk?
Or is it going to happen again without us doing anything about it?
PROBABLY..............
{edited for (appall) (apae) bad spelling)
[ 23 November 2001: Message edited by: terrain safe ]