Creampuff
The Skehill report was predicted to be a whitewash before it was finally presented.
This supposedly "independant" report was compiled by a legal firm retained by CASA, hardly independant.
It is no coincidence that the reporter is reputedly known as "The Whitewash".
The simple facts are that the T/L severely bastardised three of his own staff and at least two operators.
Significantly, none of the bastardised or their legal representatives were included in "the investigation".
Only the offender and the NQ area office were "investigated".
The outcome, after asking the offenders if they had done wrong,
was predictably, that there was no problem with the conduct of the T/L and inter alia, the NQAO.
This is a repeat of the process where earlier one of the bastardised operators reportedly presented BB
with damning, cold, hard, indexed and documented evidence, which was then given to the offender to investigate himself.
Somehow this is not all that different to asking the Police Commissioner to investigate allegations of corruption
regarding himself and his senior staff.
And you suggest doing the healthy thing and move on.
Probably not a bad idea, the stench of the rotting corpses is overpowering.
LHRT
No contradiction, just considering the legislation and process regarding unfair dismissal.
Two offenders can be proven (in a court) to have deliberately committed offences. Sackable.
The other two are simply guilty of misconduct and the legislation indicates counselling at least three times. not sackable.
Again, no contradiction, four need sacking, but grounds only exist to sack two at this time.