I would still love to know why BALPA is supporting this claim.
The last seminar I attended, run by that august body, seemed to consist of little more than BA pilots and political appointees.
A dedicated Chauvanist, actually a French patriot and nothing whatsoever to do with sexual liberation, I hold no candle for
JS nor her ilk. This does not mean that I have climbed out of the ark but rather that I try to balance all perspectives in this tortuous and tedious claim. Why then, is BALPA, which professes perhaps to represent all of us pilots, championing a cause which, at the end of the day, will possibly benefit one individual at the expense of collective damage to the rest of us?
