Torres
Interesting comment, CASA admits things could have beeen handled better.
They seem to have forgotten the past.
The recent vendettas sustained against a Mount Isa operator,
a Mackay operator and a Cairns operator seem to repeat the mistakes of the past.
Somehow these matters deserve the attention of a criminal court,
not the appeal process of the AAT.
Malfeascence is the minimum offence committed, repeatedly.
Expensive Barristers can overcome CASA misconduct in the AAT,
but compensation for the commercial harm done or legal costs do not emanate from the AAT.
That the miscreants can inflict millions (YES MILLIONS) of dollars in harm, and get away with it is a sad reflection on our Western Democracy.
The offenders must be brought to trial and gaoled if proven guilty.
There must be accountability and there must be compensation.
Uzu had millions of dollars harm done to them, as have other operators.
All on a whim of a protected and unaccountable bureacrat
Lets all hope that frustration does not eventually see similar scenarios as do some Family Court matters.