OK, on consideration I accept the database input factor, and having been exposed as not reading the AIC until tonight I will withdraw all accusations of, umm, well I didn't make any really, but I withdraw the implications.
Not being equipped with an ILS in my small part of the world, I hadn't read the thread you posted, but it doesn't change my unease, so I'm going to leave this here as a potential source of discussion. If there is none generated it will disappear into obscurity by itself.
My basic point remains though. Isn't there something wrong with a system that is delivering more potential problems than before because we are slaves to the technology rather than vice-versa? Nothing is surer than that we will be hung out to dry for any incident involving nomenclature confusion on the basis that we were told to be careful.
Maybe it's just change fatigue after ten years of it non-stop. Or maybe I'm just getting old and grouchy.
