I'm sorry to have to state the obvious, but given O'Learys obsession with cost savings...why the hell would he want to employ women when they are likely to insist on the right to avail of PAID maternity leave.
Sure, husbands have limited rights to time off around birth...I'm not au fait what FR does to comply with this (I'll bet its given grudgingly) - but a few weeks time off for dad is nothing compared to the cost of months off for mommy!
If I was O'Leary there is no way I'd hire women...beyond a few raging lezzers as token females...to make the numbers look good.