Hello Lon..
The minus 25% figure for Maastricht comes off the EUR RVSM web pages, and the flow bulletins I've seen which detail all the flow that's being imposed.
I agree it does seem a bit harsh for the introduction of RVSM, but if the UK experience of "early" introduction of RVSM last year is anything to go by, you'll be able to raise the rates pretty quickly. RVSM works, and works well IMHO.
As for estimates in lieu of ACT / OLDI messages this should only be for the period from 0001-0330 (-ish) on 27th Jan. By 0330 at the latest NERC should be up and running with all the OLDI link enabled.
I've said before I'm not a NSEA expert so can't comment on FLAS, but will say that Swanwick ain't perfect by a long way, but it's the only system we've got (not by choice). I understand the frustration faced by AMS/ Copenhagen / and yourselves, and I symphathise, really I do. Imagine what it's like for
us who actually have to operate it!.
Seriously though please address any probs to the NERC Management, they apparently have a system for dealing with just this type of thing. A very large dustbin. <img src="wink.gif" border="0">
Anyway to reiterate. WE are just as frustrated as you. Hopefully we can make it work a bit better when we finally get to grips with it this weekend. No promises though.
Best rgds (esp to RADAR RADAR!)
BEX