It's not just ILS's. I don't like the idea that an approach that is, say, a TWIN NDB/DME will now be titled NDB with a footnote that , oh, by the way, you require (a) dual ADF and (b) DME. This was exactly the situation that caused the USN accident at Dubrovnik.
I have no problem with the GPS/RNAV(GNSS) naming convention change. I think ICAO are going to have a few differences filed here....