PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - US threatens WTO action on Airbus
View Single Post
Old 15th Nov 2004, 00:23
  #152 (permalink)  
SLuca
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Belgium
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pontious,

The 767 is the best tanker because it matches the USAF size/weight requirements.

The A330 is 50% heavier than the 767 and would be a replacement for the KC10.
The USAF has never had the intention to replace the KC135 by a KC10-sized jet, and Airbus rethoric won't change that.

If the USAF wanted to get an A330 sized jet, they would probably investigate converted MD11 tankers as a cheaper alternative.

BTW, it's no secret that the 767 is a more fuel efficient aircraft than the A330.
SLuca is offline