Can't say I really agree with testing the brakes immediately upon touchdown. I guess either you have a requirement to use maximum barking or you don't. I have always found that checking the brakes as part of a pre landing check is more than adequate - although even this method is known to have 'locked' the brakes on occasion only to then blow a tyre on touchdown.
Sometimes holding the nose up after landing is even more effective than braking. I remember the problems I used to have with a P68. The brakes would get red hot and be totally ineffective but holding the nose up in the old dog of an aeroplane would slow it down nicely. Unless there was a requirement to exit the runway quickly or stop on a short runway then it was company policy to avoid brakes whenever possible (in this aeroplane).
The same argument applies to reverse thrust. Should you go Beta Range when there is no operational requirement? Two manual I have for the same aeroplane from different airlines specify opposite requirements!?! What makes more sense from an operators point of view?
I am a big fan of the 'Rapid Exit'. I think it's silly that at most GA airports (in Australia anyhow) you have to do a full 90 degree turn to exit the runway which essentially means you have to slow down to below taxi speed on the runway before you turn.