LU,
Thanks for the info.
I dont think anyone would have any doubts that such a system is needed and that in the present situation it most certainly was required.
I also dont think that anyone would disagree that it should stay in place until safety is assured.
What I have trouble with is as it says in your info
"This plan was originally developed in the 1960's and authorizes NORAD, the FAA, and the FCC to impose flight restrictions in order to clear the skies of all non-essential air traffic and shut down all navigation aids."
It would appear that no single body is in control.
You have no doubt read the thread on the Leajet heart transplant. The aircraft was escorted to the US border by Canadian fighters so not some light hearted mission.
FAA quoted "miscommunication" - Hello - this is hardly the time for miscommunication.
Next read the thread on the GA resumption by AOPA. They were told (by the FAA) they could resume flights subject to filing plans etc etc.
Many operators did this complying with all the rules and being authorised by ATC, only to have fighters intercept and force them to land.
AOPA has received assurance that the FAA will not file violations against those pilots.
For What ??? Following FAA instructions too closely.
Part of the after event ivestigation needs to take a long look at the FAA ability and effectiveness