PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - 707 Engine pylons
View Single Post
Old 29th October 2004 | 10:42
  #6 (permalink)  
Notso Fantastic
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,914
Likes: 0
From: UK
The 720 was quite considerably shorter than a 707, and designed for short range routes. I would assume that 2 turbocompressors were more suitable. As for the 707, if 3 turbocompressors were sufficient, why force airlines to go through the added cost & maintenance of 4? It saved ducting through the wing & pylon as well as a whole air unit and control system attached.
Notso Fantastic is offline