Gaunty
Mind how you go, remember the first law of inquiries, know the result before you start. Don’t discount the possibility that Chris Masters might not quite see “the big picture” the same way you see it. Inquiries in recent years have not treated a number of unions or "business enterprises" too kindly.
A Royal Commission would be even better, proper rules of evidence, everything on the public record, no “editing”. Nemo debet esse judex in propria causa
Bring it on, let’s get the facts out in the open, it would be a fascinating exercise. I would lay a small bet that one Richard Harold Smith would be the first to cooperate.
Hermeias
You were going well until you couldn't resist it, next time you personalise a post it will be the last. In the same tenor you suggest;
nemo judex in sua causa?
Nobody here suggested he/she/they be a judge in his/her/their own case.
A rational reading of this thread seems to suggest one way or another a seeking to get "it" out there in the most appropriate forum.
Which or whom should consider. Caveat feles obesus lest they bring upon themselves a scandalum magnum and cassu belli?
Fiat! habeas corpus.
Last edited by Woomera; 18th Oct 2004 at 03:38.