YCKT
.... and more controllers. So where's the problem with that ...
It won't contribute to saving $70M/year, which was the main factor Smith used to justify NAS.
You will find (verified by a recent poll I think) that 98% of us here believe airspace reform is a good thing - provided
- it has demonstratable safety & cost benefits AND
- is supported by the industry
- is subject to thorough safety analysis AND
- has widespread industry support, not one individual or group attempting to steamroll their wishes on others and exercising influence on the government to get their way.