RC - you're probably right about the way that AOPA claimed to represent the views of industry and acted as though it had universal support 'negotiating' JAR-FCL PPL proposals.
But that is water under the bridge now. This time there is a NPPL steering committee representing the industry - or rather those parts of industry which have an organisation through which to present their views.
So what do you do if you're not a member of AOPA, BGA, BMAA, GAMTA, GAPAN or the PFA, you're concerned about the NPPL and you want to make your views known? Perhaps the best solution is to e-mail AOPA and ask for your views to be put before the next NPPLSC meeting.
[This message has been edited by BEagle (edited 05 March 2001).]