pitfalls for the unwary. These should be identified before the charts are used, but we (the operating industry) rarely complain or seek changes for the seemingly inconsequential issues.
Drifting slightly off-topic here, but I think the main discussion's run its course.
When, in the Sim, we come across pitfalls, anomalies and even errors in procedures, I consider it my job to complain and seek changes. I have always had an excellent response from the procedure designers at CAA. And from the publishers of Plates, if that's where the error lies. So I'm making two points:
1. Sim instructors are the perfect people to identify and follow up procedure problems. That's why I follow threads like this one.
2. Changes and corrections can be done quickly and easily with just a phone call - in UK at any rate.
HTH