Thanks for the links, Mac.
I had a look at both. I thought the first was hoist on its own petard. It accuses Gibson of, among other things, promoting personal views as fact and making unsubstantiated claims and statements. Yet that is just what the site does in reference to Gibson. It attacks the person, not the ideas or claims. I followed quite a few of its plethora of links and found much the same. My impression is that it is pretty much a crusade written by a zealot.
The second link is far more useful and has in fact moderated my enthusiasm for Gibson's writings. Reasonable critiques of claims and statements, backed up with technical explanation. Of course, for those of us who don't know one way or t'other that may not mean much and may be confusing, contradicting things we thought were unarguable fact, but at least it's credible discussion and not just personal vilification.
AA
Last edited by Ausatco; 24th September 2004 at 09:27.