This looks like the usual political/civil servant twaddle that is meant to confuse the paying public thus re-enforceing the mythe that we need such people to represent us.
For one I would suggest theat the British government before agreeing to any such charges 'ring-fence' the current revenue raised in fuel duty, except in a dire emergency we do not use roads so one would assume that monies raised in this way should go as the GA contribution.
Can anyone suggest practical ways that the 'common man' will have his voice heard in the fiasco that is about to follow.
Mike
(bull**** baffles brains)