In a post dated 21st July 2004 16:56, kansasw wrote:
Personally I think it is a cleverly composed account written by a person with an agenda, published by a venue with an agenda, and rings to me like writing swollen with agenda-serving distortions....which may sadly feel quite accurate to the reporter, but that is her problem don't let it be yours. Develop your critical eye.
I quote barry60's post in the Pass/SLF thread as best representative of my view: "The article is from an extremely alarmist paper. Absolute rubbish."
So, in the opinion of you and barry60, absolutely nothing happened?
It's all fabricated?
You guys must be guided by that saying, "Don't believe anything you hear or read, and only believe half of what you see."
Perhaps you two would hold a different viewpoint had you been on the flight. Or you could have countered the version of events as expressed by the author of the piece.
ONTPax