Discussion is already underway in Passengers and SLF Forum under the thread "Another 9/11?" Moderators will probly shift your post to there.
Apparently you believe everything you read, I mean, you appear to uncritically accept the report and then make your own comments based on the allegations therein.
Personally I think it is a cleverly composed account written by a person with an agenda, published by a venue with an agenda, and rings to me like writing swollen with agenda-serving distortions....which may sadly feel quite accurate to the reporter, but that is her problem don't let it be yours. Develop your critical eye.
I quote barry60's post in the Pass/SLF thread as best representative of my view: "The article is from an extremely alarmist paper. Absolute rubbish."