Interesting stats!
When I took Met in April it was a walk in the park - half of it straight from feedback, and another big block of marks for the taking simply for reading stuff off weather charts, I still had to guess a lot of 1-mark answers but ended up scoring 94%.
Conversely I can't believe the June 2004 stats are showing a 90-100% pass rate in Radio Nav! It must have been a piece of cake compared to the paper I sat this week which was a nightmare and I will be happy just if I scored 50%.
Do the CAA really not have any clue whatsoever as to how to moderate exam standards?
As I've had a few resits I can testify to the fact that they obviously don't!