The possibility of getting your pension capped for lack of a vacancy at lhr is not something I'd thought of.....sounds a bit unreasonable!
Sadly you are right about the company's attitude. (and BALPAs?) We have to ask whether lgw is better or worse for BALPA's approach over the years? Would LGW be on better Ts and Cs had BALPA stayed out?
Ultimately the aim has to be bid line rules at lgw. Never you may say! However the movement of airbus to lgw provides a great opportunity - it's that or a very small airbus base at lgw, seperate from lhr...with all the problems that will generate.
Well I'm hopeful anyway!!