CM,
Good posts! They're fine examples of how arrogance, pointless aggression and ad-hominem attacks weaken an argument and derail what was threatening to be a useful thread.
As for the suggestion that someone has been at the booze, my money would not be on
AA.
To return to the actual point here, you say that:
All you're showing is a total ignorance of IFR operations in class 'G' and a complete disregard of other airspace users who have as much (if not more valid) reason to be in a particular piece of airspace.
Ignoring the histrionics, the implication seems to be that IFR pilots, and the controllers dealing with them, assume that they have a degree of priority in practice that they do not actually have in law in Class G airspace, and expect VFR pilots to work to these same assumptions.
That doesn't seem to be particularly 'fair', or, more importantly, particularly safe.