OVER RUN
Thankyou for the article. I had previously on pprune advised Dick that if you took the approach of the DR (septic )Roberts report and its attack on the Broome DAS, science and airspace reform would not advance.
This report which is proudly posted on Dick's web site adds nothing to knowledge, is only geared to attack, analyses no data, attempts no counter analysis, and is hopelessly flawed in that it states the BME DAS did not consider air-ground incidents. The Dr Septic states this quoting a clause that was refering to another report and not the DAS. The DAS infact included considerable analysis to a/c-a/c incidents on the ground and a/c-Ground vehicles, also apron crowding problems.
[B]Dick I refer you to table 9 of the DAS that shows your Dr Septic is plain wrong.
You should remove this report or insure it is corrected! I know you will not, for as the Patron of the skeptics, it is par for the course. (ref OVER RUN post on septics tactics)