Noticed the following on the Airservices website
http://www.airservicesaustralia.com/...cnsw040617.pdf
Minutes of NSW RAPAC Meeting 17 June 2004
On completion of Peter’s presentation Bill Hamilton responded, stating he was speaking on behalf of the members of AOPA, AUF, ASAC and RFAC, and advised that they all support NAS Stage 2B.....
To
Gaunty and other AOPA members:, is this gent your national president or speaking on his behalf when conveying your unified support?
Also below in the same document although off topic. It relates to a proposal that Airservices report incidents involving aircraft to the Certificate of Registration holder, and Airservices's response that privacy issues were involved if they were to do so.
Bill Hamilton, AOPA, requested Bernie Smith, CEO Airservices, to review the privacy policy, in reference to this particular situation, in order for COR holders to become immediately aware of an incident report involving their aircraft.
Len Yates, CASA, explained that the ESIR’s received by CASA are reviewed before the decision is made to notify the pilot. This review process by CASA can contribute to the delay in notifying pilots as there is a lack of resources to quickly process the information. He explained however that not all ESIR’s upon review require notification by CASA to the pilot.
Therefore having all notifications sent directly to the COR holder may infer that an incident is being investigated by CASA, when in fact they may have decided not to proceed further.