Now I am really getting concerned. It looks like a few of us are suffering from "Stockholm Syndrome".
NAS IS NOT ACCEPTABLE IN ANY WAY
NAS is not compatable with the ATM Strategic Plan.
If NAS is implimented as advertised and the Stategic Plan come into effect when ATS-B comes on line, we will end up with "E" airspace down to 1200 feet AGL all over the country, no VFR aircraft fitted with ADS-B sqitters, 3 times the number of controllers for the expanded "E", all at the expense of IFR aircraft!
This is not a very good outcome.
Please do not think that just because we go through correct safety procedures to justify that it is safe that is the airspace that we need for the future. IT IS NOT!!
