PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - The NAS Debate: Other Opinions
View Single Post
Old 22nd Jun 2004, 01:04
  #93 (permalink)  
GaryGnu
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: They seek him here, they seek him there
Posts: 141
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Devil Transponder and Airspace

Planespeaker/GaggedAgian

You have said,

Wouldn't you rather be vectoring the 74 in E with all operating mode "C'"s rather than with an ID'd target in "C" with unidentified primary target (that could be in C you never know) in "G"????
and

I'd much rather traffic advisories in E on unknown VFR's rather than being an IFR Pilot in G without TCAS on descent heading at 200KTS toward a 4 seat 120KT VFR with no transponder coming the other way.
It is the mandatory transponder requirement of the NAS changes that gives the safety margins you are alluding to not the airspace reclassifications.

Whilst acknowledging that both the changes came in with NAS, they should not be seen as a package. There is no reason the two elements cannot be decoupled.
GaryGnu is offline