PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - The NAS Debate: Other Opinions
View Single Post
Old 16th Jun 2004, 05:45
  #19 (permalink)  
*Lancer*
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 811
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mr Smith,

You crave a tower at Broome, and are pushing for Unicom operators at other airports to improve traffic awareness while allowing greater freedoms for GA traffic...

And on the other hand propose 'see-and-avoid' as the primary collision avoidance measure in class E airspace between VFR/IFR traffic.

You claim that the tower/Unicoms would improve saftey, and on the other hand propose that implementing 'see-and-avoid' as the sole, real measure doesn't reduce it. Aren't these two philosophies in direct conflict with each other?
*Lancer* is offline